TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC (TXN) Q2 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q2 revenue $4.45B and EPS $1.41, both above consensus; revenue +9% q/q and +16% y/y, driven by a broad industrial recovery, while auto declined slightly q/q but grew y/y .
- Gross margin expanded 110 bps q/q to ~58% and operating margin reached ~35%; management guided Q3 revenue to $4.45–$4.80B and EPS $1.36–$1.60, implying flattish GM% given higher depreciation .
- Tone turned more cautious vs Q1 as management flagged tariff/geopolitical noise and potential Q2 “pull-ins,” especially in China; still sees cyclical recovery progressing with four of five end markets improving .
- Cash generation remained strong: TTM CFO $6.44B and FCF $1.76B; TI returned $6.71B to owners over TTM; Q3 dividend maintained at $1.36 per share .
- Strategic U.S. manufacturing build-out continues (Sherman, Richardson, Lehi), positioning TI for geopolitically dependable, low-cost 300mm capacity; management expects cash tax rates to be significantly lower for several years due to new U.S. tax law .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Industrial revenue “upper teens” y/y and “mid-teens” q/q with broad-based recovery across sectors; China industrial led growth, contributing to overall sequential strength .
- Enterprise systems grew ~40% y/y (about 10% q/q), with data center demand strong; management highlighted >50% growth and new SiGe-based capabilities ramping in Sherman .
- Gross margin increased 110 bps q/q to ~58%, aided by higher revenue and mix, despite rising depreciation; operating margin reached ~35% .
What Went Wrong
- Automotive was down low single digits q/q and only mid-single digits y/y growth, with recovery described as “shallow,” consistent across U.S., Europe, and China .
- Management described Q2 as “noisy,” attributing part of strength to tariff-related inventory “pull-ins” in early quarter, normalizing later; hence more conservative Q3 guide relative to Q2 beat .
- Net of OI&E and interest expected to be ~$20M unfavorable in Q3 as cash levels declined and interest expense rose, tempering EPS fall-through despite revenue growth .
Financial Results
Values with asterisk (*) retrieved from S&P Global.
Segment performance
Key performance indicators
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “Revenue increased 9% sequentially, led by continued broad recovery in industrial, and 16% from the same quarter a year ago.” – Haviv Ilan .
- “Gross profit in the quarter was $2.6 billion, or 58% of revenue… Operating profit was $1.6 billion… Net income… $1.41 per share.” – Rafael Lizardi .
- “Our customers are increasingly valuing our geopolitically dependable capacity… TI has a unique answer [with U.S. manufacturing footprint].” – Haviv Ilan .
- “Data center… is behaving very well this year… growing nicely at a very high level, above that 50%… ramping new technology in Sherman, Texas.” – Haviv Ilan .
- “We continue to invest in our competitive advantages… manufacturing and technology, broad product portfolio, reach of our channels, and diverse and long‑lived positions.” – Rafael Lizardi .
Q&A Highlights
- Tone and guidance: Management acknowledged Q2 benefited from early-quarter tariff-related “pull-ins,” normalizing later; hence a prudent Q3 outlook despite cycle strength in four of five markets .
- Gross margin mechanics: Q3 GM% guided about flat despite higher revenue due to rising depreciation; OpEx about flat; net OI&E/interest ~$20M unfavorable .
- Utilization/inventory: Q3 loadings to run “about the same” as Q2; inventory expected to grow but at a slower rate; day levels down to 231 in Q2 .
- Automotive: Recovery remains shallow; orders largely real-time (consignment) with low inventories across tiers; regionally consistent sequential performance .
- Tax law: GAAP tax rate to rise in Q3; decline in 2026; materially lower cash taxes for several years; Capex plans unchanged ($5B in ’25; $2–$5B in ’26) .
Estimates Context
- Q2 2025: TI delivered a clean beat versus consensus, with revenue $4.45B vs $4.32B* and EPS $1.41 vs $1.366*; beats driven by industrial strength and robust turns activity, with early-quarter tariff-related orders contributing . Values retrieved from S&P Global.
- Q3 2025: Guidance revenue range $4.45–$4.80B brackets consensus ~$4.64B*; EPS range $1.36–$1.60 brackets consensus ~$1.486*; given net OI&E headwind and depreciation, Street may trim GM/EBIT fall-through assumptions while maintaining cautious auto trajectory . Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Industrial momentum is real and broad; Q3 guide prudently accounts for Q2 “pull-ins,” but the cycle is progressing across most end markets; auto remains the laggard .
- Expect near-term gross margin plateauing as depreciation steps up; model lower net OI&E given rising interest expense and lower cash levels in Q3 .
- China ran “hot” in Q2 (industrial-led); normalization likely in Q3, reducing risk of double-ordering while maintaining cycle improvement .
- U.S. manufacturing build-out is a structural competitive advantage for geopolitically dependable capacity and cost, with data center and SiGe pipelines ramping for 2026+ .
- New U.S. tax law is a medium-term FCF catalyst: GAAP tax up in Q3 ’25, down in ’26; cash taxes significantly lower for several years—supportive of dividend durability and opportunistic buybacks .
- Embedded margins remain pressured by LFAB underutilization but should inflect as internal manufacturing ramps and mix improves; maintain longer-term embedded contribution in models .
- Near-term trading: Stock likely reacts to beats vs Q2 consensus and cautious Q3 tone; watch for data center updates and industrial momentum vs tariff noise; medium-term thesis hinges on cycle normalization, U.S. fab ramp, and FCF leverage from tax law changes .
Notes:
- Values marked with * are retrieved from S&P Global consensus data via GetEstimates.
Citations: Q2 press release and tables ; Q2 call ; 8‑K 2.02 ; Q1 press release/call ; Q4 press release/call ; Dividend PR ; Manufacturing PR .